🔗 Share this article

For months, threatening phone calls persisted. At first, reportedly from a former police officer and a retired army general, later from law enforcement directly. Ultimately, Mohammad Khurshid Shaikh states he was summoned to the local precinct and warned explicitly: keep quiet or face serious consequences.

This third-generation resident is among those resisting a multimillion-dollar redevelopment plan where one of India's largest slums – an iconic Mumbai neighborhood – is scheduled to be bulldozed and modernized by a large business group.

"The unique ecosystem of Dharavi is like nowhere else in the planet," explains Shaikh. "However the plan aims to destroy our way of life and prevent our protests."

Contrasting Realities

The narrow alleys of the slum stand in sharp opposition to the soaring skyscrapers and Bollywood penthouses that loom over the area. Residences are assembled randomly and typically missing basic amenities, small-scale operations release harmful emissions and the air is saturated with the unpleasant stench of exposed drainage.

To some, the promise of Dharavi transformed into a developed area of luxury high-rises, neat parks, shiny shopping centers and residences with multiple bathrooms is an aspirational dream achieved.

"There's no sufficient health services, paved pathways or drainage and we have no places for children to play," explains a chai seller, 56, who migrated from Tamil Nadu in 1982. "The single option is to demolish everything and build us new homes."

Community Resistance

But others, including Shaikh, are resisting the plan.

All recognize that Dharavi, consistently overlooked as an illegal encroachment, is desperately requiring investment and development. But they are concerned that this plan – lacking public consultation – might convert a piece of prime Mumbai real estate into a playground for the rich, evicting the marginalized, immigrant populations who have lived there since the late 1800s.

It was these shunned, migrant workers who built up the empty marshland into a frequently examined example of self-reliance and commercial output, whose economic value is valued at between $1m and $2m per year, making it one of the world's largest unregulated sectors.

Displacement Concerns

Of the roughly 1 million residents living in the crowded sprawling zone, fewer than half will be able for alternative accommodation in the project, which is estimated to take a significant period to accomplish. Additional residents will be transferred to barren areas and coastal regions on the distant periphery of Mumbai, threatening to break up a historic neighborhood. Some will receive no housing at all.

Residents permitted to remain in Dharavi will be provided flats in multi-story structures, a major break from the evolved, communal way of dwelling and laboring that has maintained this area for generations.

Industries from tailoring to ceramic crafts and material recovery are expected to decrease in quantity and be moved to a designated "commercial zone" separated from residential areas.

Livelihood Crisis

For those such as Shaikh, a craftsman and long-time inhabitant to reside in the slum, the plan presents an existential threat. His makeshift, multi-level workshop produces apparel – formal jackets, luxury coats, decorated jackets – sold in premium stores in upscale neighborhoods and abroad.

Relatives resides in the spaces underneath and laborers and garment workers – migrants from north India – also sleep there, allowing him to afford their labour. Beyond Dharavi's enclave, housing costs are often significantly more expensive for basic accommodation.

Pressure and Coercion

In the government offices in the vicinity, a conceptual model of the Dharavi project illustrates an alternative outlook. Fashionable people mill about on cycles and eco-friendly transport, acquiring international bread and croissants and having coffee on a patio outside a coffee shop and Ice-Cream. It is a world away from the 20-rupee idli sambar morning meal and 5-rupee chai that maintains local residents.

"This isn't progress for our community," explains the protester. "It represents an enormous real estate deal that will price people out for residents to remain."

Additionally, there exists skepticism of the development company. Run by a prominent businessman – among the country's wealthiest and a supporter of the government head – the corporation has faced accusations of preferential treatment and ethical concerns, which it disputes.

Even as local authorities calls it a joint project, the developer paid a significant amount for its majority share. Legal proceedings alleging that the initiative was unfairly awarded to the developer is pending in the nation's highest judicial body.

Sustained Harassment

Since they began to vocally oppose the project, local opponents state they have been faced an extended period of pressure and threats – comprising messages, clear intimidation and implications that opposing the initiative was equivalent to opposing national interests – by figures they assert represent the business conglomerate.

Part of the group accused of issuing the threats is {a retired police officer|a former law enforcement official|an ex-c