🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it seems it’s time for a rethink. Over the years, an observance that began as a festivity and recollection of heritage, traditions and links between Black populations worldwide, has developed a commercial tone, growing to encompass events where African descendants are remunerated to talk to predominantly white listeners about implicit prejudice and active solidarity. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s generated a rise in the business of displaying cultural sensitivity. However, that period has concluded. The tide has peaked, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what promoting consciousness is for.

The Background of Black History Month

Initially celebrated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of celebration and reflection in the middle of February. Black History Month evolved from this campaign and was publicly established in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the North America in winter, but also in autumn in the Britain, the Federal Republic of Germany, Ireland and the Holland.

The observance has transformed since that time, giving reduced attention to the narratives of transatlantic enslavement and civil rights battles, and more on prominent Black figures in government, the arts, and social movements, and widely honoring the input Black people have made to shape the country. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the manner the celebration is celebrated is a indication of the current political situation. How it evolves is a instructive case in how co-option leads to weakening: the transformation of Black History Month has hindered the purpose of it, which is to address systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Few things illustrate how crucial it is to reevaluate Black History Month more than the particular moment in which it occurs this year. In the UK, a revitalized conservative movement in the guise of the Reform party is leading the polls. In the summer we observed the largest far-right rally in the UK's past. the Conservative leader, the Black leader of the Conservative party, is a staunch adversary of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a situation where a legislator feels empowered to declare that “not seeing any white faces” in specific city neighborhoods is a source of worry. Meanwhile, ultra-nationalist movements are surging in the EU as a complete entity.

In the US, a significant offensive against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been carried, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the highest courts of the country. A campaign to erase the history of people of color and legacy from the archives is in progress. One of Donald Trump's early administrative commands focused on the museum of African American legacy, and the prestigious establishment, alleging that they of a “concerted and widespread effort to alter the country's historical narrative” by depicting the United States “as naturally discriminatory”.

In this context, the observance illustrates how insufficiently it can be effective if it is confined to either dutiful corporate observances, or depoliticized celebrations of former accomplishments, rather than addressing the realities of the contemporary world. It also demonstrates how its restricted time span means that it is detached from the broader ongoing work that is needed. A university professor, a prof at an educational institution, articulated it most accurately when she voiced worries about the short-term symbolic gestures of the celebration. “The problem with embracing a superficial method”, she commented, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month becomes a transient display rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Figuring out how to alter, change and broaden initiatives for racial equality and recognition in such times of discouragement and concern is a treacherous thing. There is a urge to just do away with observances such as Black History Month entirely, assuming they are no longer suitable, or are remnants of an period that has failed to deliver.

Yet, in spite of all this, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and heritage of racial movements – local anti-racism groups, inclusion and equity efforts, and indeed, including corporate presentations – form an foundation that a lot of work has gone into. It is there not merely to decline as the politics moves on (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month appear as? Firstly, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is spread out across all seasons (as some institutions are already starting to implement), elements of its material (particularly around prominent figures of color) included in school curriculums. It would also be a period that does not evade governmental matters, and allows opportunity for individuals, particularly the younger generation, to share their anxieties and narratives. What purpose serves basic knowledge of the past when it ignores the current situation of extreme conservative demonstrations in the public spaces? Establishments who celebrate it should not be reassured with the passive language of “unconscious bias” and awareness of subtle slights, but faced with the dangers that impact society if anti-racism is not taken seriously. In short, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, critical, and responsive. It could be that an complete renaming is in order – Contemporary Black History Month.