🔗 Share this article

Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie is an cute little “ham sandwich”. The whale Orion – nicknamed “Onion” – is a big but fiercely protective friend. Zephyr has “endless energy” and moves like a wiggly creature. Lillooet the beluga is the “most affectionate” with a kind nature.

A group of thirty captive marine mammals in a Canada-based amusement park have become pawns in a struggle between a closed attraction, local and national governments and welfare campaigners.

But those closest to the whales say the heated debate over their future often overlooks the individual traits of the whales who, after spending their lives in confinement, have been thoroughly researched by the humans who see them each day.

After the national authorities prevented the transfer of the belugas to a foreign facility, the struggling amusement park near Niagara Falls where they are kept stated it would consider to euthanize them unless the authorities pays for the upkeep of keeping them alive. The nation’s marine resources official has denied that ultimatum, placing the thirty whales in an ever more uncertain circumstance.

Highly Cognitive Marine Mammals

Experts say that belugas’ brain structure, along with their sound replication, cognitive challenges and communal behavior point to they are highly cognitive animals – something a former trainer observed first-hand.

She spent several years as a whale caretaker, a position that involved gaining confidence of the aquatic animals.

“Building up those relationships over time takes a lot of dedication and a lot of affection. At the outset, they’re very unsure of you,” she said. “In time, you gain reciprocal understanding. And they start being more trusting with you. It’s just so extraordinary and fulfilling.”

The trainer knew the whales were highly intelligent, but she says she was nevertheless astounded by the details and unique traits in their characters. She cultivated a special affection for two female belugas with contrasting natures.

“Eve chose me. The other made me earn it,” she said. “They transformed the way I understand relationships.”

Public Concerns and Facility Decline

Burgess’s connection with the whales progressed against a context of rising activist criticism to their captivity.

During her time at the facility, multiple belugas and the park’s single orca, the orca, succumbed. In total, nineteen belugas have perished at the park since recent years, a statistic which the facility links to natural mortality, but which activists say indicates the substandard environment in which they were kept.

The facility did not operate to the guests over the summer, but Burgess says she observed directly results of the closure. “Concrete is breaking off from the pools because they’re falling apart and not being fixed. The whales are curious and so they pick it up and swim around with fragments in their mouth. It’s distressing to see.”

The facility did not comment to a inquiry, but earlier asserted: “The whales … obtain far superior medical attention and constant attention than any human in the United Kingdom, or elsewhere.”

Fate in Limbo and Potential Resolutions

Burgess was fired from the park in the spring following the demise of Eos, an unwell beluga the caretakers had to euthanize. She said the park suspected particulars of the incident were leaked to the news outlets and she was fired soon after.

The ambiguity over the whales’ outcome has left her and current and former trainers in anguish. She says the facility’s warning to euthanize its whales is a negotiation tactic and is a “logistically impossible” endeavor, adding any efforts to humanely kill even a individual beluga would require “immense staff”, equipment and machinery.

“It’s impossible in hell the caretakers would ever do it,” she said.

She advocates for requests for the whales to be transferred right away from the facility, with its failing enclosures and shrinking team.

In the autumn, the nation’s fisheries minister turned down a bid to transfer the whales to China.

“Allowing the application would have meant a perpetual life in enclosure and a return to public entertainment,” the minister commented. “As the public, we know that belugas are meant for the wild, not in tanks for our amusement. I could not in good conscience permit an relocation that would prolong the conditions these belugas have endured.”

But the former trainer said the official’s comments reflect a broader misunderstanding of the realities of living conditions for belugas raised in confinement.

“The society needs to grasp these are whales that have spent their whole lives in enclosed habitats and they will need constant supervision for the foreseeable future,” she said. “The public just don’t comprehend that it’s not as simple as saying ‘shut it down’.”

Sanctuary Proposal and Continuing Discussion

As authorities attempt to find a answer, suggestions have been put forward, some of which have minimal feasibility. A suggested plan called for the belugas to be released into the open waters of the Arctic – where whales are a key source of sustenance for Inuit communities.

A suggested protected area in the province of Nova Scotia, which now received government approval, has proven most controversial. The planned facility, which includes a large area of protected cove, doesn’t yet exist. Advocates remain optimistic that it could ultimately represent a sustainable resolution for eight of the whales.

But, the former trainer says, among trainers she’s consulted, there is “no trust there” about what she said is “merely an experiment” in the whales’ fate.

Some experts say the prospect of a refuge reflects a changing attitudes away from animal displays and could represent a viable solution in the near future.

Charles Vinick, leader of the sanctuary project, said the location will replicate the mental engagement and diet the whales obtain from specialists, albeit in a much larger area. He said after the medical condition of whales is completely examined, which could take months|an extended period|