🔗 Share this article From Professional Dominatrix to Technology Entrepreneur: An Unconventional Campaign Against Intimate Image Abuse Madelaine Thomas states her personal experience of experiencing her intimate images shared without consent offers her a distinct perspective as a technology entrepreneur. BDSM practitioner Madelaine Thomas embodies far from your typical tech founder. Following multiple occurrences of clients distributing her intimate photographs, she was "sufficiently outraged to take action" and turned to tech solutions for answers. "These were beautiful pictures, I'm not ashamed of the photographs, I'm ashamed of the way that they were weaponized by an individual who I have never met," explained Madelaine. Madelaine has received multiple accolades including the Tech Safety Innovation award at a prominent safety summit. Just over a year after founding her company, Image Angel, which uses covert digital tracking to identify abusers, has won several awards and was recommended as best practice in an government-commissioned study earlier this year. This marks a significant shift from her previous career in offering BDSM services, working with clients in the world of BDSM. The Pervasive Problem The non-consensual sharing of private images, often referred to as revenge porn, is a punishable crime with perpetrators risking two years in prison. It is far from an issue uniquely experienced by those in the adult entertainment sector. A study indicates that approximately 1.42% of the UK female population is affected by this form of abuse on an annual basis. Madelaine, thirty-seven, explained survivors endured shame and stigma. "I think a lot of people will comment, 'you put a saucy picture out on the internet, what do you anticipate?'," she said. "I demand dignity, I expect respect, and I expect confidence, and I fail to understand why those are negotiable," she added. "The reality that those images could be subsequently distributed in my community or with my loved ones and used to hurt them, that's unacceptable, that's not a decision I made, that's not my mistake, that's an individual being an abuser." Madelaine hopes her tech will prevent potential intimate image abusers without consent. An Unconventional Path Madelaine has been practicing as a dominatrix, primarily online, for a decade and consistently found her work liberating and satisfying. "It's me as a woman in control, a woman who is empowered and strong, offering my body as a treat to someone of my own volition," she said. "People think it's strange but I don't see it any differently to a personal trainer or an financial advisor providing a service," she remarked. She embraces being a unique figure in the technology sector. "I understand that it's bizarre, it's remarkable to think that an individual who was a dominatrix is now a founder of a technology firm, but it required someone who has experienced it firsthand to understand the flaws and the changes that were necessary," she explained. She maintained she was not in the least bit techy and was managed to build her company after a lot of late nights, investigation and "consulting experts" who know about tech. How Does the Technology Work? Image Angel can be used by any digital service where people exchange photos, for instance dating apps, social media and online sites. When an image is accessed by a user, it is automatically embedded with an undetectable digital marker which is unique to them. This invisible watermark is embedded into the digital file of the image itself and can withstand screenshots, being altered and being photographed with a different camera. It ensures that if you discover your image has been circulated without your consent, as long as the service you used has the technology embedded, the sharer's information will be encoded in the image and can be extracted by a data recovery specialist so action can be taken. To date, one service has implemented her tech and she's in discussions with several more. An Established Method for a New Purpose "This technology is already in use in the film industry, it is employed in sports broadcasting so this is not brand new technology, it's just a new application and a different framework," explained Madelaine. "We have validated it, we're collaborating with a company that has decades of expertise in developing technology so we are confident that this is reliable and what we now need to do is test it at scale," she continued. She expressed hope she believed the technology would also act as a deterrent to would-be intimate image abusers. Removing Stigma, Shifting Blame An expert from a leading helpline said she had seen directly the panic, distress and self-blame intimate image abuse inflicted on victims. "When that guilt is reinforced by a uninformed acquaintance or professional who says 'well, why did you take those images in the first place?' that self blame can really be reinforced so it's crucial that the response somebody is provided with is that they have committed no error," she emphasized. She added it was inspiring that Madelaine was using her experience to create solutions, saying: "It is vital to have this comprehensive strategy towards tackling tech facilitated gender-based abuse, because no one tool is going to be able to tackle this alone, not just support services, it needs to be this multi-layered response." Madelaine Thomas and TV presenter Jess Davies have been victims of experiencing their intimate images shared without their consent. TV presenter Jess Davies was just 15 when images of her in her underwear were circulated within her town. It was the beginning of multiple violations Jess experienced in her youth that would later shape her women's rights campaigning. "It required years, an excessive amount of time for someone to tell me, 'it wasn't your fault' and 'that was wrong'," said Jess. She too is dedicated to removing the stigma of intimate image abuse from the victims to the perpetrators. "It isn't a crime to consensually send an image to someone," stated Jess. "However, it is illegal to distribute that non-consensually and I think that should always be where the blame is," she concluded.